Monotone Proofs of the Pigeon Hole Principle
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study the complexity of proving the Pigeon Hole Principle (PHP) in a monotone variant of the Gentzen Calculus, also known as Geometric Logic. We show that the standard encoding of the PHP as a monotone sequent admits quasipolynomial-size proofs in this system. This result is a consequence of deriving the basic properties of certain quasipolynomial-size monotone formulas computing the boolean threshold functions. Since it is known that the shortest proofs of the PHP in systems such as Resolution or Bounded Depth Frege are exponentially long, it follows from our result that these systems are exponentially separated from the monotone Gentzen Calculus. We also consider the monotone sequent (CLIQUE) expressing the clique-coclique principle deened by Bonet, Pitassi and Raz (1997). We show that monotone proofs for this sequent can be easily reduced to monotone proofs of the one-to-one and onto PHP, and so CLIQUE also has quasipolynomial-size monotone proofs. As a consequence, Cutting Planes with polynomially bounded coeecients is also exponentially separated from the monotone Gentzen Calculus. Finally, a simple simulation argument implies that these results extend to the Intuitionistic Gentzen Calculus. Our results partially answer some questions left open by P. Pudll ak.
منابع مشابه
A Note on Polynomial-size Monotone Proofs of the Pigeon Hole Principle
We see that the version of the pigeonhole principle in which every hole is forced to receive a pigeon (called onto) and the version in which every pigeon is mapped into exactly one hole (called functional) have polynomial-size proofs in the tree-like monotone sequent calculus. The proofs are surprisingly simple reductions to the non-monotone case.
متن کاملDAG Sequent Proofs with a Substitu- tion Rule
In this paper we study an extension to classical sequent calculus with a substitution rule, which is normally admissible in classical logic. The structure of proofs is also extended to permit DAG shaped proofs. We analyse several properties of this system, such as the complexity of cut-elimination, and propose an extended tableau proof system, called s-tableau, that corresponds to the DAGsequen...
متن کاملLower Bounds for the Weak
We prove that any Resolution proof for the weak pigeon hole principle, with n holes and any number of pigeons, is of length (2 n), (for some global constant > 0). One corollary is that a certain propositional formulation of the statement N P 6 6 P =poly does not have short Resolution proofs.
متن کاملOn Resolution Complexity of Matching Principles
Studying the complexity of mathematical proofs is important not only for automated theorem proving, but also for Mathematics as a whole. Each significant result in this direction would potentially have a great impact on Foundations of mathematics. Surprisingly enough, the general Proof Complexity is closely related to Propositional Proof Complexity. The latter area was founded by Cook and Reckh...
متن کاملDiscrete Mathematics What is a proof?
The pigeonhole principle is a basic counting technique. It is illustrated in its simplest form as follows: We have n + 1 pigeons and n holes. We put all the pigeons in holes (in any way we want). The principle tells us that there must be at least one hole with at least two pigeons in it. Why is that true? Try to visualize the example of n = 2; therefore, we have 3 pigeons and 2 holes. Let’s try...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC)
دوره 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000